Polity & Governance Practice Question›› General Knowledge ››
Parliamentary Practice
››
Difference between Motion and Resolution
M
Question 1
⏱ 0
Which of the following best describes the difference between a Motion and a Resolution in parliamentary practice?
1. A Motion is a formal decision, while a Resolution is an expression of opinion.
2. A Motion is binding on the government, while a Resolution is not.
3. A Motion is procedural, while a Resolution is substantive.
4. A Motion leads to debate, while a Resolution does not.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
(a) Only one
(b) Only two
(c) All three
(d) All four
Explanation ● Statement 1: Incorrect. A Motion is a proposal made in the House for eliciting a decision or discussion. A Resolution is a specific type of Motion that expresses the opinion or will of the House, often leading to formal decisions.
● Statement 2: Incorrect. The binding nature depends on the type of Motion or Resolution. For example, statutory or certain finaStatement 1ncial resolutions may be binding, while others may not. Similarly, some motions (like confidence motions) are binding, while others are not.
● Statement 3: Correct. A Motion is often procedural and aims to address immediate concerns, such as adjournment or setting aside a rule. A Resolution generally has a substantive purpose, such as expressing the will of the House or recommending policy action.
● Statement 4: Incorrect. Both Motions and Resolutions can lead to debates in the House. For instance, discussions on a no-confidence motion or a resolution expressing a stance on national matters involve extensive debate.
Kutos:Polity & Governance Expert
Hello! I am a Polity & Governance expert. You can ask any question or request a detailed analysis related to this topic.