Polity & Governance Practice Question›› Indian Polity ››
Supreme Court
››
Appointment of Judges
M
Question 1
⏱ 0
With reference to supreme court, consider the following:
1. The consultation with the chief justice is obligatory in the case of appointment of a judge.
2. Advice tendered by the Chief Justice of India is binding on the President in the matters of appointment of judges.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
(a) 1 only
(b) 2 only
(c) Both 1 and 2
(d) Neither 1 nor 2
Explanation Statement 1 is correct: The judges of the Supreme Court are appointed by the president. The chief justice is appointed by the president after consultation with such judges of the Supreme Court and high courts as he deems necessary. The other judges are appointed by the president after consultation with the chief justice and such other judges of the Supreme Court and the high courts as he deems necessary. The consultation with the chief justice is obligatory.
Statement 2 is correct: In the Second Judges case (1993), the Court changed the meaning of the word consultation to concurrence. Hence, it ruled that the advice tendered by the Chief Justice of India is binding on the President in the matters of appointment of the judges of the Supreme Court. But, the Chief Justice would tender his advice on the matter after consulting two of his senior most colleagues. Similarly, in the Third Judges case (1998), the Court opined that the consultation process to be adopted by the Chief justice of India requires ‘consultation of plurality judges’. He should consult a collegium of four senior most judges of the Supreme Court.
Kutos:Polity & Governance Expert
Hello! I am a Polity & Governance expert. You can ask any question or request a detailed analysis related to this topic.