Polity & Governance Practice Question›› Indian Polity ››
Panchayati Raj System
››
Comparison between PESA Act, 1996 and 73rd Amendment Act
M
Question 1
⏱ 0
Which of the following distinguishes the PESA Act, 1996 from the 73rd Amendment Act?
1. Allows Gram Sabhas control over water bodies and minor minerals.
2. Applicability to only Fifth Schedule areas.
3. Reservation for Scheduled Tribes in all Panchayats.
Select the correct answer using the code given below:
(a) Only One
(b) Only Two
(c) Only Three
(d) None of the above
Explanation Statement 1 is Correct: Under the PESA Act, Gram Sabhas are given the authority to manage natural resources, such as water bodies and minor minerals in Scheduled Areas. This decentralization of power to the local community is a unique feature of PESA.
Statement 2 is Correct: The PESA Act applies only to areas that are recognized as Scheduled Areas under the Fifth Schedule of the Indian Constitution, which are typically tribal-dominated regions. This ensures that the PESA Act is specifically tailored to these regions, in contrast to the 73rd Amendment, which applies to the entire country.
Statement 3 is not correct: The 73rd Amendment Act mandates reservation for Scheduled Tribes in all Panchayats, which applies across India. This is a broader provision that is not exclusive to PESA. PESA does not introduce new reservations but rather focuses on giving more power to Gram Sabhas and local bodies in tribal areas
Kutos:Polity & Governance Expert
Hello! I am a Polity & Governance expert. You can ask any question or request a detailed analysis related to this topic.
