Consider the following statements:
1. Mahmud Khalji’s occupation of Mandalgarh in 1457 marked a turning point in his rivalry with Rana Kumbha.
2. Rana Kumbha was able to keep his territory intact despite the periodic campaigns of Mahmud Khalji.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
(a). 1 only
(b). 2 only
(c). Both 1 and 2
(d). Neither 1 nor 2
Explanation Statement 1 is correct: In 1457, Mahmud Khalji, the Sultan of Malwa, captured the strategic fort of Mandalgarh, which was one of the important strongholds of Rana Kumbha, the ruler of Mewar. This event was indeed a turning point in their rivalry because it escalated the conflict and demonstrated Mahmud's ability to strike at the heart of Kumbha’s territory. However, despite this, Rana Kumbha managed to recover and defend his kingdom later on.
Statement 2 is correct: Rana Kumbha, despite facing multiple attacks and invasions from Mahmud Khalji, was able to defend his kingdom and keep it intact. Kumbha was a skilled military leader, and he successfully resisted many of Mahmud's campaigns, even though his territory was repeatedly invaded. The ability to preserve his kingdom and fend off these invasions shows Kumbha's resilience and strength as a ruler.
Kutos:History Expert
Hello! I am a History expert. You can ask any question or request a detailed analysis related to this topic.
