Consider the following statements with respect to Amravati school of sculptures:
1. It was developed under the patronage of the Satavahana rulers.
2. It made excessive use of the Tribhanga posture.
3. It laid more emphasis on the individual features of Buddha.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
(a) 1 only
(b) 1 and 3 only
(c) 2 and 3 only
(d) 1 and 2 only
Explanation Statement 1 is correct: The Amravati School of Sculpture emerged as a prominent artistic tradition alongside the Gandhara and Mathura schools during the Kushana period. It flourished primarily in Andhra Pradesh under the patronage of the Satavahana rulers (also known as the Andhra dynasty) and later received support from the Vakatakas. This school is renowned for its intricate carvings, narrative panels, and dynamic compositions, often depicting scenes from the Jataka tales and the life of Buddha.
Statement 2 is correct: The Amravati School of Sculpture is known for its dynamic and sophisticated carving techniques, particularly the use of the Tribhanga (three-bend) posture, which gives the figures a more naturalistic and graceful appearance.The Tribhanga posture (with bends at the neck, waist, and knee) adds a sense of movement and fluidity, making the sculptures more expressive compared to the rigid forms of earlier art styles
Statement 3 is not correct: Since the sculptures of Amravati school are generally part of a narrative art, there is less emphasis on the individual features of Buddha. While the other two schools(Mathura school and Gandhara school) focused on single images.
Kutos:History Expert
Hello! I am a History expert. You can ask any question or request a detailed analysis related to this topic.
