|
M Question 1
|
⏱ 0 |
| Dante, a linguistic Darwin, held a heretical theory. Europe’s languages, he thought, had not been made in a single moment, in a biblical Babel, but had evolved. Four centuries later, a British judge and polyglot called Sir William Jones arrived in Calcutta and was struck by the similarities between Latin and Sanskrit words for terms such as house (domus, dam) and god (deus, deva). Clearly they had “sprung from some common source, which, perhaps, no longer exists”. The world’s languages were not a babel but a brotherhood. This “common source” now has a name: “Proto-Indo-European” (PIE). It was first spoken by as little as a few dozen people around the Black Sea then, roughly 5,000 years ago, spread with rapidity “from Ireland to India”. Today, its offshoots include Irish and Hindi, and more or less everything in between. Almost half of the world’s population speaks a descendant of it. To learn that English “mother”, Latin mater and Sanskrit mata share a root provokes a pleasing etymology. Which one of the following statements best reflects the central idea of the above passage? (a) The etymological similarity of words like "mother" across various languages is a curious linguistic coincidence that pleases linguists. (b) The passage primarily celebrates the intellectual foresight of Dante and Sir William Jones in challenging established doctrines about language. (c) Proto-Indo-European (PIE), originating near the Black Sea, is the sole ancestor of all languages spoken globally today. (d) The modern understanding of many world languages which were believed to be separate, have evolutionary divergence from a common proto-language. |
|