|
E Question 1
|
⏱ 0 |
| Energy transition plans must be mindful of geopolitical vulnerabilities and avoid deepening India’s dependence on external sources for critical imports. Strategic thinking is warranted. The two obsessions of the West, the water-power-guzzling AI and energy transition, do not sit well with each other. One has to give. It appears to be the latter because the more the West (Europe, in particular) goes for wind and solar in its energy mix, the greater the coal consumption in China. The link between the two runs as follows: the requirement for critical minerals and rare earths rises with the share of renewable energy in the overall energy consumption. China dominates the production or processing of these materials. Processing requires cheap power. Otherwise, these inputs would be costlier, making energy transition even more expensive for Europe than it already is. Cheap power is possible only with coal-fired thermal plants. So, both are two sides of the same coin. This complex interplay makes one thing clear for India. It has to focus a lot more than it has so far on adaptation than on emission mitigation. The primary purpose of the passage is to: (a) Critique Western nations for their hypocritical approach to climate change and energy policy. (b) Analyze the unintended geopolitical and environmental consequences of the current global energy transition and propose a revised strategic direction for India. (c) Advocate for increased global investment in alternative, less mineral-intensive renewable energy technologies. (d) Detail the economic mechanisms through which China maintains its dominance in the critical minerals market. |
|