
Welcome to
ONLiNE UPSC
Governor Thaawarchand Gehlot has returned the draft Karnataka Microfinance (Prevention of Coercive Actions) Ordinance, 2025, to the state government. He raised concerns regarding its potential effects on business prospects, fundamental rights, and financial stability. The ordinance aims to prevent harassment by microfinance companies and reduce borrower suicides but includes provisions that have sparked legal and financial debates.
An ordinance is a law enacted by the President or Governor when the Parliament or State Legislature is not in session. This mechanism enables urgent legislative actions without waiting for the assembly to meet. However, ordinances must receive legislative approval within six weeks of the assembly’s reassembly to maintain their validity.
Under Article 163 of the Indian Constitution, the Governor possesses discretionary powers, enabling independent action in certain scenarios, such as the decision to promulgate an ordinance. In these circumstances, the Governor is not obligated to follow the advice of the Council of Ministers.
At the Union level, the President of India acts based on the advice of the Council of Ministers concerning ordinances. However, according to Article 74, the President has the authority to return the advice for reconsideration. If the Council of Ministers reaffirms its recommendation, the President is constitutionally bound to comply.
Governor Gehlot has encouraged the state government to review the ordinance during the upcoming Budget session. He stressed the importance of ensuring that the ordinance protects the interests of both borrowers and lenders before its resubmission.
Q1. What was the main reason for the rejection of the Karnataka Microfinance Ordinance?
Answer: The ordinance was rejected due to concerns about its potential negative impact on self-help groups, financial stability, and excessive loan limits among other issues.
Q2. What powers does the Governor have regarding ordinances?
Answer: The Governor has discretionary powers under Article 163, allowing independent action on whether to promulgate an ordinance without being bound by the Council of Ministers' advice.
Q3. How long does an ordinance remain valid without legislative approval?
Answer: An ordinance must be approved by the legislature within six weeks of reassembly to remain valid; otherwise, it lapses.
Q4. What concerns did the Governor express about borrower exemptions?
Answer: The Governor was concerned that exempting borrowers from repayment could discourage lending and disrupt financial systems, adversely affecting the economy.
Q5. What is the maximum loan limit proposed in the ordinance?
Answer: The ordinance proposed a maximum loan limit of ₹5 lakh, which was deemed excessive compared to the existing limit of ₹3 lakh.
Question 1: Who returned the Karnataka Microfinance Ordinance for reconsideration?
A) Chief Minister
B) Governor Thaawarchand Gehlot
C) Finance Minister
D) Union Minister
Correct Answer: B
Question 2: Under which article does the Governor have discretionary powers?
A) Article 74
B) Article 163
C) Article 123
D) Article 21
Correct Answer: B
Question 3: What is the proposed maximum loan limit in the ordinance?
A) ₹2 lakh
B) ₹3 lakh
C) ₹4 lakh
D) ₹5 lakh
Correct Answer: D
Question 4: What is required for an ordinance to remain valid?
A) Presidential approval
B) Legislative approval within six weeks
C) Public opinion
D) Council of Ministers' advice
Correct Answer: B
Question 5: What was one concern about the ordinance regarding civil courts?
A) They can handle recovery cases
B) They were barred from handling recovery cases
C) They require special permission
D) They are not affected
Correct Answer: B
Question 6: Which group did the Governor express concern about regarding the ordinance?
A) Microfinance companies
B) Bankers
C) Self-Help Groups (SHGs)
D) Government officials
Correct Answer: C
Kutos : AI Assistant!