The Supreme Court of India has made a critical ruling regarding child sexual abuse material (CSEAM). This decision emphasizes that viewing, downloading, storing, possessing, distributing, or displaying pornographic acts involving children constitutes criminal liability under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act and the Information Technology (IT) Act.
In its ruling, the Supreme Court advocated for replacing the term "child pornography" with "Child Sexual Exploitative and Abuse Material" (CSEAM). This new terminology aims to better capture the severity of the crime, as the term "child pornography" was deemed a misnomer. It risks trivializing the issue by suggesting consent, which is never applicable in cases involving minors.
The Supreme Court has directed all courts across the nation to replace the term "child pornography" with CSEAM in their judgments and orders. This change is intended to alter the legal and social understanding of these crimes, emphasizing their serious and non-consensual nature while highlighting the exploitation involved.
The court articulated that viewing CSEAM equates to the act of child sexual abuse itself. This perspective is based on the belief that such viewing reflects a "common, malevolent intent: the exploitation and degradation of a child for the sexual gratification of the abuser." By perpetuating the visibility and circulation of these exploitative materials, the trauma experienced by victims is amplified, hindering their recovery.
The Supreme Court has urged Parliament to consider amending the POCSO Act to incorporate the term CSEAM in place of "child pornography." This amendment is proposed to accurately represent the seriousness of these offenses. Additionally, the court suggested that the government promulgate an ordinance to implement this change while awaiting legislative amendment.
This ruling from the Supreme Court marks a significant development in the legal framework addressing child exploitation in India. By recognizing the viewing and possession of CSEAM as crimes equivalent to actual abuse, the court underscores the grave nature of these offenses and their ongoing impact on victims. This decision enhances the protection of children from sexual offenses and encourages a more accurate societal understanding of these crimes as severe, non-consensual exploitations that go beyond the initial act of abuse.
Q1. What is the significance of the term CSEAM?
Answer: CSEAM stands for Child Sexual Exploitative and Abuse Material, emphasizing the severe and exploitative nature of child-related sexual offenses, replacing the misleading term "child pornography."
Q2. How does the Supreme Court's ruling impact child protection laws?
Answer: The ruling enhances child protection laws by criminalizing the viewing and possession of CSEAM, thus recognizing these acts as serious offenses with ongoing consequences for victims.
Q3. What did the Supreme Court direct regarding legal terminology?
Answer: The Supreme Court directed courts to use the term CSEAM in judgments and orders, promoting a better understanding of the non-consensual nature of these crimes.
Q4. Why is viewing CSEAM considered a crime?
Answer: Viewing CSEAM is seen as perpetuating the exploitation and trauma of the child involved, reflecting the same intent as actual acts of child sexual abuse.
Q5. What legislative changes are suggested by the Supreme Court?
Answer: The Supreme Court has suggested amending the POCSO Act to include CSEAM, highlighting the need for stronger language to reflect the severity of these offenses.
Question 1: What does CSEAM stand for?
A) Child Sexual Exploitative and Abuse Material
B) Child Sexual Exploitation and Abuse Management
C) Child Sexual Emergency and Abuse Measure
D) Child Safety and Exploitation Awareness Material
Correct Answer: A
Question 2: Which act does the Supreme Court's ruling primarily relate to?
A) Information Technology Act
B) Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act
C) Juvenile Justice Act
D) Child Labour Act
Correct Answer: B
Question 3: Why did the Supreme Court suggest replacing "child pornography"?
A) It is outdated terminology
B) It misrepresents the nature of the crime
C) It is legally insufficient
D) All of the above
Correct Answer: D
Question 4: What is the aim of the Supreme Court's directive to use CSEAM?
A) To confuse legal terms
B) To trivialize child exploitation
C) To emphasize the severity of offenses
D) To promote child safety
Correct Answer: C
Question 5: What type of crimes does the ruling classify the viewing of CSEAM as?
A) Minor offenses
B) Serious crimes
C) Non-criminal behavior
D) Administrative issues
Correct Answer: B
Kutos : AI Assistant!
