
Welcome to
ONLiNE UPSC
Recently, the Supreme Court of India invalidated crucial provisions of the Tribunal Reforms Act, 2021, raising significant concerns regarding judicial independence and excessive control by the executive branch.
This Act aimed to optimize India’s tribunal system by reducing the number of tribunals. It sought to enhance efficiency, minimize delays, and simplify dispute resolution processes by centralizing the appointment, tenure, and service conditions of tribunal members under the Union Government.
One of its major impacts was the abolition of at least nine specialized tribunals and appellate bodies, redistributing their responsibilities to State High Courts and commercial courts, which were already strained with high caseloads.
The Tribunal Reforms Act, 2021 faced significant backlash for reintroducing provisions that had been previously annulled by the Supreme Court. Critics highlighted concerns over short tenures and increased executive influence in the appointment processes. The current judgment was prompted by petitions from the Madras Bar Association, among others, who argued that the Act allowed the government excessive control, compromising judicial independence.
The Court articulated several key observations regarding the Act:
Q1. What is the Tribunal Reforms Act, 2021?
Answer: The Tribunal Reforms Act, 2021 aimed to streamline India's tribunal system by reducing the number of tribunals and enhancing executive control over appointments and service conditions.
Q2. Why did the Supreme Court strike down the Act?
Answer: The Supreme Court found that the Act compromised judicial independence by allowing excessive executive control over tribunal appointments and operations, violating constitutional norms.
Q3. What is the National Tribunal Commission?
Answer: The National Tribunal Commission, as directed by the Supreme Court, will ensure the independence and effective administration of tribunals across India, maintaining uniform standards.
Q4. How does this ruling affect judicial independence in India?
Answer: The ruling reinforces the principle that judicial independence must be protected from executive overreach, ensuring that tribunals can operate impartially and effectively.
Q5. What are the implications of the Court's decision for the future of tribunals?
Answer: The decision emphasizes the need for reforms that respect judicial autonomy, potentially leading to the establishment of a more balanced and efficient tribunal system in India.
Question 1: What was the primary goal of the Tribunal Reforms Act, 2021?
A) To abolish all tribunals
B) To streamline the tribunal system
C) To increase executive control
D) To enhance judicial independence
Correct Answer: B
Question 2: Which of the following provisions was criticized in the Tribunal Reforms Act, 2021?
A) Short tenures for tribunal members
B) Increased funding for tribunals
C) Reduction in caseloads
D) Enhanced autonomy for tribunals
Correct Answer: A
Question 3: What did the Supreme Court direct regarding the National Tribunal Commission?
A) It should be established within six months
B) It should ensure transparency and uniform standards
C) It should abolish all existing tribunals
D) It should report to the Prime Minister
Correct Answer: B
Question 4: What constitutional articles reinforce the autonomy of tribunals in India?
A) Articles 14 and 21
B) Articles 323-A and 323-B
C) Articles 15 and 16
D) Articles 31 and 32
Correct Answer: B
Kutos : AI Assistant!