On 23 May 2025, the Supreme Court made a significant ruling regarding the leadership of Central Armed Police Forces (CAPFs). The court declared that CAPFs must be regarded as Organized Group A Services (OGAS) for all intents and purposes. This ruling paves the way for a gradual phasing out of Indian Police Service (IPS) officers in these forces, enabling CAPF officers to ascend to leadership roles within their respective organizations.
The Supreme Court's decision encompasses several key forces classified as CAPFs, which include:
The issue was contested primarily by CAPF officers who argued that the presence of IPS officers in senior ranks, through lateral deputation, significantly impeded their promotion prospects. This situation fostered stagnation and impacted morale adversely. On the other hand, IPS officers contended that their presence ensured uniformity and effective coordination between the states and the Centre.
OGAS status is crucial as it offers structured career progression, along with financial benefits like Non-Functional Financial Upgradation (NFFU). The classification of CAPFs as OGAS indicates that the lateral appointments of IPS officers at higher ranks are no longer justified, thus enhancing the autonomy of CAPF officers.
Under the earlier framework, a significant proportion of leadership positions in CAPFs were reserved for IPS officers: 20% of Deputy Inspector General (DIG) posts, 50% of Inspector General (IG) posts, and all Director General (DG) posts. This reservation system restricted the upward mobility of CAPF officers.
CAPF officers expressed frustration over being overlooked for promotions despite years of service and extensive field experience, particularly in challenging environments like insurgency and border operations. They felt that IPS officers, often with limited domain exposure, were unfairly prioritized, undermining their capabilities and morale.
The judgment has been perceived by IPS officers as a setback to their opportunities for central deputation. They argue that IPS involvement in CAPFs is essential for maintaining coordination between the Centre and states, ensuring national integration in policing, and preserving a unified command structure in internal security.
The Supreme Court emphasized that with the OGAS status granted to CAPFs, they should be treated equally to other central services. Any limitations on career progression or benefits due to IPS lateral entries would be deemed discriminatory, thus undermining the essence of OGAS classification.
The court has set a two-year timeframe for the gradual reduction of IPS deputation in CAPFs, especially at the level of Senior Administrative Grade (SAG).
This ruling marks a pivotal shift towards empowering specialized, cadre-led forces, moving away from dependence on external deputations. While this enhances the status of CAPF officers, it raises concerns regarding state coordination, the adequacy of leadership training, and continuity in strategic operations.
Kutos : AI Assistant!
