Navin B. Chawla, a former Chief Election Commissioner, brings forth the intriguing idea of conducting simultaneous elections across all levels of government. He highlights the potential advantages, such as significant savings in both time and financial resources. However, Chawla stresses the necessity for political consultation and reaching a consensus before considering such a substantial reform.
Chawla elaborates on the ongoing efforts of the Election Commission in managing elections year-round, a task magnified by India’s vast size and population. Organizing elections is a massive undertaking, often requiring the deployment of central government forces due to a lack of trust in state police forces. He also notes how the Model Code of Conduct can disrupt developmental and welfare schemes.
While merging elections could indeed reduce costs for political parties and candidates, Chawla acknowledges the initial investments necessary for procuring Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs) and Voter Verifiable Paper Audit Trail (VVPAT) systems. Moreover, constitutional provisions concerning five-year terms and potential government instability must be carefully considered through political discussions.
S.Y. Quraishi, another esteemed former Chief Election Commissioner, provides a counter-narrative to the idea of simultaneous elections. He points out the inherent complexity, given that the terms of the Lok Sabha and state assemblies do not usually align. According to Quraishi, facing the electorate multiple times enhances political accountability and generates employment opportunities.
Quraishi argues that elections serve purposes beyond voting, such as enforcing beneficial environmental laws and reducing crime. He highlights the logistical difficulties and financial requirements outlined by the Election Commission for conducting simultaneous elections, including the need for additional electronic voting machines.
Quraishi emphasizes the legal and constitutional hurdles that render simultaneous elections impractical at present. He proposes that, until political parties agree on this matter, efforts should focus on cost reduction by limiting political party expenditures.
The proposal for 'One Nation, One Election' garners both enthusiasm and skepticism. While some see it as a path to greater efficiency and reduced costs, others point to substantial concerns surrounding feasibility, accountability, and legal challenges. The ongoing debate continues to balance democratic ideals with practical obstacles.
Kutos : AI Assistant!
