The SAHYOG portal is a government initiative designed to automate takedown requests directed at social media platforms under the IT Act, 2000. Managed by the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) with assistance from the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY), its primary function is to facilitate the removal or disabling of content that is deemed unlawful.
Platform X, previously known as Twitter, has initiated legal proceedings against the Union government in the Karnataka High Court. It describes the SAHYOG portal as a “censorship portal,” arguing that it circumvents established legal protections by allowing various government agencies to issue takedown orders indiscriminately, thus violating legal safeguards enshrined in Indian law.
Platform X argues that the takedown orders originating from the SAHYOG portal do not constitute legal orders as per Section 69A of the IT Act and therefore should not be binding. The company contends that these orders are issued without appropriate judicial or executive scrutiny, claiming that non-compliance should not revoke its “safe harbour” protections under Section 79 of the IT Act.
Section 79 provides intermediaries, such as social media platforms, with “safe harbour” from liability concerning third-party content, provided they act upon receiving lawful orders to remove illegal content. However, this protection is dependent on adherence to due process, which Platform X argues the SAHYOG portal fails to uphold.
Section 69A empowers the government to block online content for reasons including sovereignty, state security, or public order. However, this authority must be executed following a structured procedure that includes hearings and documented orders as specified in the Blocking Rules, 2009. Platform X contends that this necessary procedure is being overlooked.
The government asserts that the takedown orders from the SAHYOG portal do not equate to blocking orders under Section 69A. It maintains that Platform X is still required to remove unlawful content, and failure to comply may result in the revocation of its safe harbour protection.
Platform X references previous rulings by the Supreme Court that emphasize the importance of procedural safeguards when issuing takedown or blocking orders. The argument posits that compelling the platform to act without due process, such as the opportunity for a hearing or an appeal, undermines its legal rights.
This case could establish a precedent for the issuance of takedown notices in India, raising questions about whether platforms can be compelled to respond to informal or executive orders devoid of clear judicial oversight. It brings to light significant concerns regarding digital rights, transparency, and the potential misuse of executive powers in regulating online content.
Q1. What is the main purpose of the SAHYOG portal?
Answer: The SAHYOG portal aims to automate takedown requests to social media platforms, facilitating the removal of content considered unlawful under the IT Act, 2000.
Q2. Why does Platform X oppose the SAHYOG portal?
Answer: Platform X argues that the portal operates as a censorship tool, allowing various government entities to issue takedown orders without adhering to legal safeguards.
Q3. How does Section 79 of the IT Act protect social media platforms?
Answer: Section 79 provides social media platforms with safe harbour protection against liability for third-party content, provided they follow due process when removing illegal content.
Q4. What are the implications of Section 69A of the IT Act?
Answer: Section 69A allows the government to block online content but requires a structured process, including hearings, which is reportedly being bypassed in this case.
Q5. What could be the outcome of this legal challenge?
Answer: This case may redefine how takedown notices are issued in India and address concerns regarding transparency and executive power in online content regulation.
Question 1: What is the primary function of the SAHYOG portal?
A) To block online content permanently
B) To automate takedown requests for unlawful content
C) To provide legal advice to social media companies
D) To monitor user activity on social media
Correct Answer: B
Question 2: Which act governs the operations of the SAHYOG portal?
A) The Digital Rights Act
B) The IT Act, 2000
C) The Social Media Regulation Act
D) The Privacy Protection Act
Correct Answer: B
Question 3: What does Section 79 of the IT Act ensure for social media platforms?
A) Unlimited liability for all content
B) Safe harbour from liability for third-party content
C) Complete control over user data
D) Financial compensation for takedown requests
Correct Answer: B
Kutos : AI Assistant!
