The collegium system is a critical mechanism for appointing High Court judges in India. This system comprises the Chief Justice of India and the two senior-most judges of the Supreme Court. Its primary aim is to safeguard judicial independence by minimizing executive interference in judicial appointments.
According to Article 217 of the Indian Constitution, the President of India appoints High Court judges. This process requires consultations with the Chief Justice of India, the Governor of the respective state, and the Chief Justice of the concerned High Court. This multilateral consultation is designed to ensure that appointments are fair and just.
The Second Judges Case in 1993 was pivotal in reforming the appointment process. It led to the formal establishment of the collegium system, making its recommendations binding on the President. This reform significantly enhanced judicial independence by limiting the executive's role in judicial appointments.
In December 2022, the Supreme Court intervened regarding the recommendations made by the Himachal Pradesh High Court collegium. The Supreme Court raised concerns about procedural adherence, particularly in evaluating the seniority and merit of two district judges recommended for appointment. This intervention underscores the court's commitment to ensuring fair and transparent judicial appointments.
This comprehensive overview highlights the robust framework aimed at preserving judicial independence and integrity within the Indian legal system. As Benjamin N. Cardozo aptly stated, “Justice is not to be taken by storm. She is to be wooed by slow advances.”
Q1. What is the collegium system for appointing High Court judges?
Answer: The collegium system comprises the Chief Justice of India and the two senior-most Supreme Court judges, who recommend candidates for High Court positions, ensuring judicial independence.
Q2. What does the Indian Constitution say about High Court judge appointments?
Answer: Article 217 of the Constitution mandates that High Court judges are appointed by the President, following consultations with the Chief Justice, the Governor, and the Chief Justice of the High Court.
Q3. How did the 1993 collegium verdict reform the appointment process?
Answer: The Second Judges Case established the collegium system, making its recommendations binding on the President, thus enhancing judicial independence by limiting executive power.
Q4. Why did the Supreme Court intervene in the Himachal Pradesh collegium's decision?
Answer: The Supreme Court intervened due to procedural issues in the collegium's recommendations, emphasizing adherence to guidelines regarding seniority and merit in the appointment process.
Q5. What are the significant cases influencing the collegium system?
Answer: The Second Judges Case (1993) established the collegium system, while the Third Judges Case (1998) clarified its composition and consultation requirements for judicial appointments.
Question 1: What is the primary purpose of the collegium system in India?
A) To enhance executive power in appointments
B) To ensure judicial independence
C) To centralize judicial authority
D) To limit the role of the judiciary
Correct Answer: B
Question 2: Which article of the Indian Constitution pertains to High Court judge appointments?
A) Article 217
B) Article 124
C) Article 226
D) Article 32
Correct Answer: A
Question 3: What did the Second Judges Case establish regarding judicial appointments?
A) The role of the Governor
B) The collegium system
C) The President's absolute power
D) Direct appointments by Parliament
Correct Answer: B
Question 4: In what year did the Third Judges Case occur?
A) 1993
B) 1998
C) 2002
D) 2005
Correct Answer: B
Question 5: What was a reason for the Supreme Court's intervention in the Himachal Pradesh High Court's collegium recommendations?
A) Lack of candidates
B) Procedural issues
C) Political influence
D) Financial constraints
Correct Answer: B
Kutos : AI Assistant!
